US Must End ‘Highly Fragmented’ Approach To Reactor Deployment If It Is To Complete Globally

Thinktank says challenge is deploying nuclear efficiently, affordably and at scale required to meet growing electricity demand

US Must End ‘Highly Fragmented’ Approach To Reactor Deployment If It Is To Complete Globally
The Vogtle nuclear power station in the US state of Georgia. Courtesy Georgia Power.

The US must work to standardise across the nuclear industry and end a fragmented approach to delivery if it is to lower financial and project risks for reactor projects, according to a paper by Boston-based thinktank Clean Air Task Force (CATF).

CATF said that recent announcements such as the US Department of Energy’s $17.5bn (€15.3bn) loan commitment to develop up to 10 Westinghouse AP1000 reactors reflected a growing recognition that nuclear deployment required orderbooks and repeat construction programmes.The report said that when developers, utilities and governments commit to multiple reactor builds a demand pipeline is created, suppliers could invest and costs came down.

“Unfortunately, the current US nuclear landscape remains highly fragmented. Multiple developers are pursuing different technologies, utilities are approaching projects independently, and procurement strategies remain largely uncoordinated,” said Lindsey Popken, author of the paper.

Want to keep reading?

Register free and get full access to NucNet for 14 days. No card required.

Republish or license this article

MORE THAN 30 YEARS OF NUCLEAR INDUSTRY REPORTING.

Subscribe for full access to every article, the archive and the SMR and AMR database.

Join NucNet