Coal-To-Nuclear / Hundreds Of Sites Could Be Converted For Reactors, Says US DOE Study

Transition could save industry millions of dollars on new-build costs
Hundreds Of Sites Could Be Converted For Reactors, Says US DOE Study
NuScale says building its SMRs at retiring fossil fuel and coal plant sites means workers can be cross-trained and millions of dollars saved. Courtesy NuScale.
Hundreds of US coal power plant sites could convert to nuclear power stations, adding new jobs, increasing economic benefit, and significantly improving environmental conditions, a study by the US Department of Energy concludes.

This “coal-to-nuclear” transition could add a substantial amount of clean electricity to the grid, helping the US reach its net-zero emissions goals by 2050.

The study says costs, schedules and economic characteristics of coal-to-nuclear projects will vary widely, according to their differing purposes and technologies.

Building a new nuclear plant on an existing coal site could result in savings of up to 35% over construction on a greenfield site.

Want to keep reading?

Register free and get full access to NucNet for 14 days. No card required.

Republish or license this article

MORE THAN 30 YEARS OF NUCLEAR INDUSTRY REPORTING.

Subscribe for full access to every article, the archive and the SMR and AMR database.

Join NucNet