Maritime / Nuclear-Powered Bulk Vessels Could Sail ‘Longer, Faster And Cheaper’, Says Report

Modifications needed for reactor would have minimal impact on cargo capacity

Nuclear-Powered Bulk Vessels Could Sail ‘Longer, Faster And Cheaper’, Says Report
The study compares a nuclear-powered Newcastlemax bulk carrier with vessels powered by other fuel types. Courtesy ULC-Energy/C-Job.

Nuclear propulsion offers the lowest operational cost for bulk shipping carriers which could use reactors to sail “longer, faster, and cheaper”, all without producing greenhouse gas emissions, a report by Netherlands-based nuclear development and consulting company ULC-Energy has concluded.

The report says that nuclear propulsion offers the lowest operational cost per tonne shipped for a Newcastlemax bulk carrier, a class of vessel with a maximum beam 50 metres and maximum length overall of 300 metres. This is significantly lower than alternatives like ammonia fuel, which is under development, or a type of marine fuel known as very low sulphur fuel oil (VLSFO).

The study compares a nuclear-powered Newcastlemax bulk carrier with one powered by conventional VLSFO and one powered by green ammonia.

Want to keep reading?

Register free and get full access to NucNet for 14 days. No card required.

Republish or license this article

MORE THAN 30 YEARS OF NUCLEAR INDUSTRY REPORTING.

Subscribe for full access to every article, the archive and the SMR and AMR database.

Join NucNet