Fukushima 10 Years On / Institutional Failure Led To Breakdown Of Public Trust, Says NEA Report

Paris-based agency says more effort needed in Japan to ‘develop and institutionalise’ a system for nuclear safety
Institutional Failure Led To Breakdown Of Public Trust, Says NEA Report
The root cause of the Fukushima-Daiichi accident in Japan almost 10 years ago was structural flaws in nuclear administration that led to a breakdown in public trust and raised concerns about the nuclear industry elsewhere in the world, a report published on Wednesday by the Nuclear Energy Agency says.

The report, which examines progress, lessons and challenges from the accident, says understanding that the accident was a system failure rather than attributable to just one or more components in the system is key to ensuring that wider lessons are learnt.

Regulation in Japan was reformed to specifically address these structural flaws – particularly issues of transparency, openness, and independence – with the creation of the Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) in 2012.

The report says the regulatory transformation has been challenging but has met with success in the implementation of plant improvements against natural phenomena such as tsunamis and in safety improvements aimed at station blackout threats to core cooling and backup electrical power. These were all specific lessons learnt from the Fukushima-Daiichi experience.

Want to keep reading?

Register free and get full access to NucNet for 14 days. No card required.

Republish or license this article

MORE THAN 30 YEARS OF NUCLEAR INDUSTRY REPORTING.

Subscribe for full access to every article, the archive and the SMR and AMR database.

Join NucNet